Деталі
Опубліковано: Середа, 17 червня 2020, 15:07
Перегляди: 1377
8. SCIENTIFIC SUBSTANTIATION OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL METHODS OF DEVELOPMENT OF BIOPREPARATIONS FOR PRODUCTION OF ENSILAGE
https://doi.org/10.31073/foodresources2020-14-08
Danylenko Svitlana, Teterina Svitlana, Khonkiv Miroslav
Pages: 67-79
 
Abstract
In countries with humid climates and harsh winters during which it is either impossible to obtain green feed, or it is difficult to store dried feed, such as hay, the need to provide nutrients and animal energy is satisfied by the implementation of silage. Such regions include Europe (in particular Ukraine), North America and tropical regions (in particular, Brazil). The market of modern biological preparations for silage is characterized by the predominant use of multicomponent bacterial compositions. However, despite the development of biotechnology, and the available experience in the field of ensilage, the question of the rational choice of the composition of combined inoculants from the necessary profile of fermentation in raw materials remains relevant. The work aimed to determine the main prerequisites and factors on which the choice of the composition of the biological product for silage depends, as well as to characterize the main microbiota used to create bacterial compositions and describe the mechanisms of their preserving effects. The study used such general scientific research methods as analysis, synthesis, generalization, induction, and deduction. To display the process of knowledge formation on the issue of bacterial preparations, the historical method was used. To illuminate the effect of dry matter on the chemical characteristics of the silo, a graphical method was used. The source of literary materials was publicly available scientific and informational resources: databases, scientific journals, and periodicals. During the study, the main plant material for silage was characterized and the most universal plant crop was determined. The main parameters that affect the chemical and microbiological composition of the finished silo are determined. The classification of silage microbiota depending on the type of metabolism is given and their preservative properties are described. The results are aimed at using the characteristics of raw materials and properties of biological agents presented in the article as a theoretical basis for experimental studies in the development of biologics for silage and recommendations for the rational selection of effective commercial silage inoculants in the context of animal feed procurement technology.
Key words: silage, bacterial composition, combined biopreparation, canning green forages
 
References
1. Reich L. J., Kung L. Jr. Effects of combining Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 with various lactic acid bacteria on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010. Vol. 159, №3-4. P. 105-109.
2. Addah W., Baah J., Okine E. K., McAllister T. A. A third-generation esterase inoculant alters fermentation pattern and improves aerobic stability of barley silage and the efficiency of body weight gain of growing feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2012. Vol. 90, № 5. P. 1541-1552.
3. Thomas M. E., Foster J. L., McCuistion K. C., et.al. Nutritive value, fermentation characteristics, and in situ disappearance kinetics of sorghum silage treated with inoculants. J. Dairy Sci. 2013. Vol. 96, № 11. P. 7120-7131.
4. Rabelo C. H. S., Härter C. J., Ávila C. L. S., Reis R. A. Metaanalysis of the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri on fermentation, chemical composition and aerobic stability of sugarcane silage. Grassl. Sci. 2019. Vol. 65, № 1. P. 3-12.
5. Kung Jr L., Shaver R. D., Grant R. J., Schmidt R. J. Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of dairy Science. 2018. Vol. 101, № 5. P. 4020-4033.
6. Borreani G., Tabacco E. The relationship of silage temperature with the microbiological status of the face of corn silage bunkers. Journal of Dairy Science. 2010. Vol. 93, № 6. P. 2620-2629.
7. Tennant R. K., Sambles C. M., Diffey G. E., et.al. Metagenomic Analysis of Silage. J. Vis. Exp. 2017. №119. e54936. https://doi.org/10.3791/54936.
8. Satter L. D., Reis R. B. Milk production under confinement conditions. 2012. US. Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-ARS and Dairy Science Department. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
9. Jonsson A. Growth of Clostridium tyrobutyricum during fermentation and aerobic deterioration of grass silage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 1991. Vol. 54, № 4. P. 557-568.
10. Sebata A. An Insight into Current and Future Production of Forage Crops in Zimbabwe. New Perspectives in Forage Crops. 2018. P. 89-104.
11. Silva M. S. J. D., Jobim C. C., Poppi E. C., et.al. Production technology and quality of corn silage for feeding dairy cattle in Southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2015. Vol. 44, № 9. P. 303-313.
12. Maasdorp B. V. Titterton M. The use of planted trees for fodder. Proceedings of workshop on Livestock Production Research in the Semi-Arid Tropics, held by Department for International Development (DFID), Matopos, Zimbabwe. February 1999. Smith, T. (Ed.). 2000.
13. Amer S., Seguin P., Mustafa A. F. Effects of feeding sweet sorghum silage on milk production of lactating dairy cows. Journal of dairy science. 2012. Vol. 95, № 2. P. 859-863.
14. Rodrigues A. L. P. et al. In situ dry matter degradation of tropical forages harvested at different ages. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2004. Vol.56, № 5. P. 658-664.
15. Yitbarek M. B., Tamir B. Silage additives. Open Journal of Applied Sciences. 2014. Vol.4, № 5. P. 258-274. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2014.45026.
16. Driehuis F., Oude Elferink S. J. W. H., Van Wikselaar P. G. Fermentation characteristics and aerobic stability of grass silage inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri, with or without homofermentative lactic acid bacteria. Grass and Forage Science. 2001. Vol. 56, № 4. P. 330-343.
17. Seppälä A., Heikkilä T., Mäki M., Rinne M. Effects of additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of grass silages and total mixed rations. Grass and forage Science. 2016. Vol. 71, № 3. P. 458-471.
18. Wrobel B., Zielinska K. J., Fabiszewska A. U. The effect of biological additives on aerobic stability of silages from meadow sward intended for feeding and energy production. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering. 2017. Vol. 62, № 4. P. 205-210.
19. Herrmann C., Idler C., Heiermann M. Improving aerobic stability and biogas production of maize silage using silage additives. Bioresource Technology. 2015. Vol. 197. P. 393-403.
20. Markoviс J., Blagojeviс M., Kostiс I., et.al. Effect of bacterial inoculants application and seeding rate on common vetch-oat silage quality. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. 2019. Vol. 34, № 2. P. 251-257.
21. Danylenko. S. G., Khonkiv M. O., Iskra K. O. Laktobakterii dlia sylosuvannia roslynnoi syrovyny. Ahrarna nauka ta kharchovi tekhnolohii. [Lactobacilli for ensilage vegetable raw materials. Agricultural science and food technology] 2019. Vol. 108, №5. P. 3-12.
22. Sychevskij N. P., Kopylova K. V., Danylenko S. G. Effektivnost' preparata «Senosil» dlya konservirovaniya silosa. Zernovi produkty i kombikormy. [The effectiveness of the drug "Senosil" to preserve the silage. Cereal products and compound feeds] 2016. Vol. 63, № 3. P.16-21.
23. Syrovatko K. M. Vplyv biolohichnoho konservantu na yakist ta produktyvnu diiu sinazhu. Ahrarna nauka ta kharchovi tekhnolohii. [Biological effect of preservative on the quality and productive action of silage. Agricultural science and food technology] 2017. Vol. 1, № 95. P. 90-96.
24. Kurnaiev O. Yakist ta enerhetychna pozhyvnist liutsernovoho sylosu pry zastosuvanni bakterialno-fermentnoho preparatu. Tvarynnytstvo Ukrainy. [Quality and nutritional value of alfalfa silage energy when applying bacterial-enzyme preparation. Ukraine Livestock] 2015. № 4. P. 40-42.
25. Pahlow G., Muck R. E., Driehuis F., et.al. Microbiology of ensiling. Silage science and technology. 2003. Vol. 42. P. 31-93.
26. Kung Jr. A Review on Silage Additives and Enzymes. Department of Animal and Food Sciences University of Delaware. Newark. 2003.
27. Lavermicocca P., Valerio F., Evidente A., et.al. Purification and Characterization of Novel Antifungal Compounds from the Sourdough Lactobacillus plantarum Strain 21B. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000. Vol. 66, № 9. P. 4084-4090.
28. Ström K., Sjögren J., Broberg A., Schnürer J. Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB 393 produces the antifungal cyclic dipeptides cyclo (L-Phe-L-Pro) and cyclo (L-Phe-trans-4-OH-L-Pro) and 3-phenyllactic acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002. Vol. 68, № 9. P. 4322-4327.
29. Dieuleveux V., Gueguen M. Antimicrobial effects of D-3- phenyllactic acid on Listeria monocytogenes in TSB-YE medium, milk, and cheese. J. Food Prot. 1998. Vol. 61. P. 1281-1285.
30. Dieuleveux V., Lemarinier S., Gueguen M. Antimicrobial spectrum and target site of D-3-phenyllactic acid. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998. Vol. 40. P. 177-183.
31. Dieuleveux V., Van Der Pyl D., Chataud J., Gueguen M. Purification and characterization of anti-Listeria compounds produced by Geotrichum candidum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998. Vol. 64. P. 800-803.
32. Weinberg Z. G., Ashbell G., Hen Y., Azrieli A. The effect of applying lactic acid bacteria at ensiling on the aerobic stability of silages. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1993. Vol. 75. P. 512-518.
33. Danner H., Holzer M., Mayrhuber E., Braun R. Acetic acid increases stability of silage under aerobic conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003. Vol. 69. P. 562-567.
34. Zielinska K., Fabiszewska A., Swiątek M., Szymanowska-Powałowska D. Evaluation of the ability to metabolize 1,2-propanediol by heterofermentative bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2017. Vol. 26. P. 60-63.
35. Kleinschmit D. H., Kung Jr. L. A meta-analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn and grass and small-grain silages. Journal of dairy Science. 2006. Vol. 89, № 10. P. 4005-4013.
36. Valerio F., Lavermicocca P., Pascale M., Visconti A. Production of phenyllactic acid by lactic acid bacteria: an approach to the selection of strains contributing to food quality and preservation. FEMS microbiology letters. 2004. Vol. 233, № 2. P. 289-295.
37. Moon N.J. Inhibition of the growth of acid tolerant yeasts by acetate, lactate and propionate and their synergistic mixtures. J.Appl. Bacteriol. 1983. Vol. 55. P. 454-460.
38. Arriola K. G., Kim S. C., Adesogan A. T. Effect of applying inoculants with heterolactic or homolactic and heterolactic bacteria on the fermentation and quality of corn silage. Journal of dairy science. 2011. Vol. 94, № 3. P. 1511-1516.

naas logo mes logo