- Деталі
- Опубліковано: Субота, 02 липня 2022, 11:42
- Перегляди: 313
MODERN MODELS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROGRESS AND FOOD SYSTEM SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
https://doi.org/10.31073/foodresources2022-18-19
Mykola Sychevskiy, Liudmyla Deineko, Oksana Kushnirenko, Nataliia Voznesenska
Pages: 193-206
Mykola Sychevskiy, Liudmyla Deineko, Oksana Kushnirenko, Nataliia Voznesenska
Pages: 193-206
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to substantiate and highlight the various models of socio-economic development implementation and to determine the basis for the sustainable food system formation in Ukraine. Research methods. During the study, the following methods were used: general scientific methods (abstract-logical, induction and deduction, systems approach; analysis and synthesis), as well as special research methods: statistical comparisons, groupings, sampling (to assess the consequences of the implementation of various models of socio-economic development and determine the basis for sustainable food system in Ukraine). Research results. It was found that the current structure of the food system is at the epicenter of global problems, which are addressed by the Sustainable Development Goals, the success of which depends on the choice and implementation of the foundations of the socio-economic development of countries. By means of a comparative analysis, it has been proved that the countries that have reached the highest level of sustainable socio-economic development have the highest level of food security. Consequently, building a sustainable food system is a priority area that should be given the highest priority by the government. The basic foundations of the sustainable food system formation in Ukraine have been substantiated, in particular, the importance of introducing the doctrine of socio-economic development on the principles of sustainable development; adoption of unified and standardized strategic documents for the sectoral industries on the basis of sustainable development with the coordination of the interests of the main stakeholders and taking into account national priorities in the strategy process. Scientific novelty. The justification was further developed ways to solve the problem, it is proposed to form a unified system of strategic management of a sustainable food system based on doctrinal foundations that combine forecasting, strategizing, resource balance and budgeting, based on stimulating the innovative development of the domestic agri-food sector. Practical significance. Indicators are determined that assess the performance of national economies with different types of models of socio-economic development. The basic principles of the formation of a sustainable food system in Ukraine are substantiated on the basis of the introduction of an equitable system of distribution of national wealth, which will contribute to the formation of a broad stratum of the middle class, ensuring its effective demand and opportunities to improve health and well-being.
Keywords: food system, socio-economic progress, sustainable development, liberal model, socially oriented model, national security
The purpose of the article is to substantiate and highlight the various models of socio-economic development implementation and to determine the basis for the sustainable food system formation in Ukraine. Research methods. During the study, the following methods were used: general scientific methods (abstract-logical, induction and deduction, systems approach; analysis and synthesis), as well as special research methods: statistical comparisons, groupings, sampling (to assess the consequences of the implementation of various models of socio-economic development and determine the basis for sustainable food system in Ukraine). Research results. It was found that the current structure of the food system is at the epicenter of global problems, which are addressed by the Sustainable Development Goals, the success of which depends on the choice and implementation of the foundations of the socio-economic development of countries. By means of a comparative analysis, it has been proved that the countries that have reached the highest level of sustainable socio-economic development have the highest level of food security. Consequently, building a sustainable food system is a priority area that should be given the highest priority by the government. The basic foundations of the sustainable food system formation in Ukraine have been substantiated, in particular, the importance of introducing the doctrine of socio-economic development on the principles of sustainable development; adoption of unified and standardized strategic documents for the sectoral industries on the basis of sustainable development with the coordination of the interests of the main stakeholders and taking into account national priorities in the strategy process. Scientific novelty. The justification was further developed ways to solve the problem, it is proposed to form a unified system of strategic management of a sustainable food system based on doctrinal foundations that combine forecasting, strategizing, resource balance and budgeting, based on stimulating the innovative development of the domestic agri-food sector. Practical significance. Indicators are determined that assess the performance of national economies with different types of models of socio-economic development. The basic principles of the formation of a sustainable food system in Ukraine are substantiated on the basis of the introduction of an equitable system of distribution of national wealth, which will contribute to the formation of a broad stratum of the middle class, ensuring its effective demand and opportunities to improve health and well-being.
Keywords: food system, socio-economic progress, sustainable development, liberal model, socially oriented model, national security
References
1. Heiets V. (2020). Fenomen nestabilnosti – vyklyk ekonomichnomu rozvytku: monohrafiia [The phenomenon of instability – a challenge to economic development: Monograph]. IEP NASU. Kyiv. Akademperiodika. 456 p. [In Ukrainian].
2. Zabarna Y. (2015). Vplyv osnovnykh faktoriv svitovoi prodovolchoi problemy na stan i perspektyvy prodovolchoi bezpeky Ukrainy. [Influence of the main factors of the world food problem on the state and prospects of food security of Ukraine]. Ekonomika ta derzhava. [Economy and state], 5, pp. 145–148. [In Ukrainian].
3. Zelenska O., Zelensky S., Aleshugina N. (2014). Systemnyi, synerhetychnyi ta bikheviorystychnyi pidkhody u doslidzhenni problem prodovolchoi bezpeky. [Systematic, synergetic and behavioral approaches in the study of food security]. Naukovyi visnyk Chernihivskoho derzhavnoho instytutu ekonomiky i upravlinnia. [Scientific Bulletin of the Chernihiv State Institute of Economics and Management], 3 (23), pp. 23-30. [In Ukrainian].
4. Kulakovska, T. (2020). Metodolohiia otsinky rivnia prodovolchoi bezpeky krainy. [Methodology for assessing the level of food security of the country]. Ekonomichni ta sotsialni aspekty rozvytku Ukrainy na pochatku XXI stolittia. [Economic and social aspects of Ukraine's development at the beginning of the XXI century]. October 15-16 2020, Odessa. Odessa National Academy of Food Technologies, pp. 140-142. URL: https://card-file.onaft.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/17158/1/Ekon_sots_aspekty_rozv_2020_ Kulakovska.pdf [In Ukrainian].
5. Lupenko, Y. (2012). Formuvannia perspektyvnoi modeli silskoho hospodarstva [Formation of a promising model of agriculture]. Ekonomika APK. [Economics of agro-industrial complex] 11, pp. 10-14 [In Ukrainian].
6. Mostova, A. (2019). Stratehichne zabezpechennia prodovolchoi bezpeky Ukrainy. [Strategic food security of Ukraine.] Kharkiv. Tochka Publishing House. 311 p. [In Ukrainian].
7. Fedulovа, I. (2013). Prodovolcha bezpeka: sutnist, stan ta osoblyvosti zabezpechennia. [Food security: essence, state and features of security]. Kyiv. Condor Publishing House. 468 p [In Ukrainian].
8. Sabluk, P. Stan i napriamy rozvytku ahrarnoi reformy. [Status and directions of agrarian reform]. Ekonomika APK. [Economics of agro-industrial complex]. 2015, № 2, pp. 10-17 [In Ukrainian].
9. Samit OON z prodovolchykh system 2021. Orhanizatsiia Obiednanykh Natsii v Ukraini. [UN Summit on Food Systems]. URL: https://ukraine.un.org/uk/136882-samit-oon-z-prodovolchykh-system-2021-ukrayina-provela-tretiy-natsionalnyy-dialoh [In Ukrainian].
10. Sychevsky, M. (2019). Kharchova promyslovist yak osnova prodovolchoi bezpeky ta rozvytku derzhavy. [Food industry as a basis for food security and state development]. Kyiv. Institute of Food Resources NAAS. 500 р. [In Ukrainian].
11. Sychevsky, M., Yuzefovich, A. (2014). Rozvytok kharchovoi promyslovosti: aktsenty derzhavnoi polityky. [Development of the food industry: highlights of public policy]. Ekonomika APK. [Economics of agro-industrial complex]. № 7. pp. 46–52. [In Ukrainian].
12. Skidan, O. (2017). Prodovolcha bezpeka yak priorytet ahrarnoi polityky: problemy instytutsionalizatsii. [Food security as a priority of agricultural policy: problems of institutionalization]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok. [Public administration: improvement and development]. http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=154. [In Ukrainian].
13. Pro Tsili staloho rozvytku Ukrainy na period do 2030 roku. [The Sustainable Development Goals of Ukraine until 2030]. Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 30.09.2019. [Decree of the President of Ukraine from 30.09.2019] https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/722/2019 [In Ukrainian].
14. Harari, Y. (2020). Sapiens. Liudyna rozumna. Korotka istoriia liudstva. [Sapiens. The man is smart. A brief history of mankind]. Kyiv: Book Chef, 2020. 544 p. [In Ukrainian].
15. Shpykuliak, O., Mazur, G. (2015). Instytutsiini zasady ta sotsialno-ekonomichni determinanty stymuliuvannia staloho rozvytku silskykh terytorii: teoretychnyi aspekt. [Institutional principles and socio-economic determinants of stimulating sustainable development of rural areas: a theoretical aspect]. Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskoho universytetu. Zbirnyk nauk. prats. Ekonomika. [Scientific Bulletin of Chernivtsi University: Collection of Sciences. work. Economy], 730-731. pp. 21-25. [In Ukrainian].
16. Bernal, J. (1971). Science in History. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T Press, 442 p. [In English].
17. Ease of Doing Business rankings. (2021). The World Bank Group. URL: https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/rankings. [In English].
18. FAO. (2021). Global Food Security Index. URL: https://foodsecurityindex.eiu.com/ Country/Details#Ukraine. [In English].
19. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2021). FAOSTAT. Ukraine. URL: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#country/230. [In English].
20. Gini index. (2021). World Bank estimate. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ SI.POV.GIN. [In English].
21. Schader, C., Muller, A., Scialabba, N. E. H., Hecht, J., Isensee, A., Erb, K. H. (2015). Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12 (113). URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26674194/ . [In English].
22. Tansey, G., Worsley, A. (2014). The food system. Routledge. 272 pp. URL: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203380932. [In English].
23. Tendall, D. M., Joerin, J., Kopainsky, B., Edwards, P., Shreck, A., Le, Q. B. (2015). Food system resilience: defining the concept. Global Food Security, рр. 17-23. [In English].
24. World Bank (2021). World Bank Open Data. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/ [In English].
1. Heiets V. (2020). Fenomen nestabilnosti – vyklyk ekonomichnomu rozvytku: monohrafiia [The phenomenon of instability – a challenge to economic development: Monograph]. IEP NASU. Kyiv. Akademperiodika. 456 p. [In Ukrainian].
2. Zabarna Y. (2015). Vplyv osnovnykh faktoriv svitovoi prodovolchoi problemy na stan i perspektyvy prodovolchoi bezpeky Ukrainy. [Influence of the main factors of the world food problem on the state and prospects of food security of Ukraine]. Ekonomika ta derzhava. [Economy and state], 5, pp. 145–148. [In Ukrainian].
3. Zelenska O., Zelensky S., Aleshugina N. (2014). Systemnyi, synerhetychnyi ta bikheviorystychnyi pidkhody u doslidzhenni problem prodovolchoi bezpeky. [Systematic, synergetic and behavioral approaches in the study of food security]. Naukovyi visnyk Chernihivskoho derzhavnoho instytutu ekonomiky i upravlinnia. [Scientific Bulletin of the Chernihiv State Institute of Economics and Management], 3 (23), pp. 23-30. [In Ukrainian].
4. Kulakovska, T. (2020). Metodolohiia otsinky rivnia prodovolchoi bezpeky krainy. [Methodology for assessing the level of food security of the country]. Ekonomichni ta sotsialni aspekty rozvytku Ukrainy na pochatku XXI stolittia. [Economic and social aspects of Ukraine's development at the beginning of the XXI century]. October 15-16 2020, Odessa. Odessa National Academy of Food Technologies, pp. 140-142. URL: https://card-file.onaft.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/17158/1/Ekon_sots_aspekty_rozv_2020_ Kulakovska.pdf [In Ukrainian].
5. Lupenko, Y. (2012). Formuvannia perspektyvnoi modeli silskoho hospodarstva [Formation of a promising model of agriculture]. Ekonomika APK. [Economics of agro-industrial complex] 11, pp. 10-14 [In Ukrainian].
6. Mostova, A. (2019). Stratehichne zabezpechennia prodovolchoi bezpeky Ukrainy. [Strategic food security of Ukraine.] Kharkiv. Tochka Publishing House. 311 p. [In Ukrainian].
7. Fedulovа, I. (2013). Prodovolcha bezpeka: sutnist, stan ta osoblyvosti zabezpechennia. [Food security: essence, state and features of security]. Kyiv. Condor Publishing House. 468 p [In Ukrainian].
8. Sabluk, P. Stan i napriamy rozvytku ahrarnoi reformy. [Status and directions of agrarian reform]. Ekonomika APK. [Economics of agro-industrial complex]. 2015, № 2, pp. 10-17 [In Ukrainian].
9. Samit OON z prodovolchykh system 2021. Orhanizatsiia Obiednanykh Natsii v Ukraini. [UN Summit on Food Systems]. URL: https://ukraine.un.org/uk/136882-samit-oon-z-prodovolchykh-system-2021-ukrayina-provela-tretiy-natsionalnyy-dialoh [In Ukrainian].
10. Sychevsky, M. (2019). Kharchova promyslovist yak osnova prodovolchoi bezpeky ta rozvytku derzhavy. [Food industry as a basis for food security and state development]. Kyiv. Institute of Food Resources NAAS. 500 р. [In Ukrainian].
11. Sychevsky, M., Yuzefovich, A. (2014). Rozvytok kharchovoi promyslovosti: aktsenty derzhavnoi polityky. [Development of the food industry: highlights of public policy]. Ekonomika APK. [Economics of agro-industrial complex]. № 7. pp. 46–52. [In Ukrainian].
12. Skidan, O. (2017). Prodovolcha bezpeka yak priorytet ahrarnoi polityky: problemy instytutsionalizatsii. [Food security as a priority of agricultural policy: problems of institutionalization]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok. [Public administration: improvement and development]. http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=154. [In Ukrainian].
13. Pro Tsili staloho rozvytku Ukrainy na period do 2030 roku. [The Sustainable Development Goals of Ukraine until 2030]. Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 30.09.2019. [Decree of the President of Ukraine from 30.09.2019] https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/722/2019 [In Ukrainian].
14. Harari, Y. (2020). Sapiens. Liudyna rozumna. Korotka istoriia liudstva. [Sapiens. The man is smart. A brief history of mankind]. Kyiv: Book Chef, 2020. 544 p. [In Ukrainian].
15. Shpykuliak, O., Mazur, G. (2015). Instytutsiini zasady ta sotsialno-ekonomichni determinanty stymuliuvannia staloho rozvytku silskykh terytorii: teoretychnyi aspekt. [Institutional principles and socio-economic determinants of stimulating sustainable development of rural areas: a theoretical aspect]. Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskoho universytetu. Zbirnyk nauk. prats. Ekonomika. [Scientific Bulletin of Chernivtsi University: Collection of Sciences. work. Economy], 730-731. pp. 21-25. [In Ukrainian].
16. Bernal, J. (1971). Science in History. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T Press, 442 p. [In English].
17. Ease of Doing Business rankings. (2021). The World Bank Group. URL: https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/rankings. [In English].
18. FAO. (2021). Global Food Security Index. URL: https://foodsecurityindex.eiu.com/ Country/Details#Ukraine. [In English].
19. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2021). FAOSTAT. Ukraine. URL: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#country/230. [In English].
20. Gini index. (2021). World Bank estimate. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ SI.POV.GIN. [In English].
21. Schader, C., Muller, A., Scialabba, N. E. H., Hecht, J., Isensee, A., Erb, K. H. (2015). Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12 (113). URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26674194/ . [In English].
22. Tansey, G., Worsley, A. (2014). The food system. Routledge. 272 pp. URL: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203380932. [In English].
23. Tendall, D. M., Joerin, J., Kopainsky, B., Edwards, P., Shreck, A., Le, Q. B. (2015). Food system resilience: defining the concept. Global Food Security, рр. 17-23. [In English].
24. World Bank (2021). World Bank Open Data. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/ [In English].
Copyright © 1960-2025 Інститут продовольчих ресурсів НААН України - iprkyiv.com