Food Resources. 2022. N 19. Article 28 — Інститут продовольчих ресурсів НААН України

Деталі: Опубліковано: Понеділок, 23 січня 2023, 10:19; Перегляди: 190

28. IMPROVEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL PRINCIPLES OF TARGETED FOOD SUPPORT FOR THE POPULATION
https://doi.org/10.31073/foodresources2022-19-28
Oksana Slobodeniuk, Natalia Prysiazhniuk, Oksana Rudych, Nadia Svynous, Larysa Khakhula
Pages: 254-264

Abstract
Subject of research. Organizational and economic relations in the process of forming targeted food support. Purpose. On the basis of elaboration of domestic and world experience to offer practical recommendations for the formation of economic principles of targeted food aid to the population. Methods. The following research methods were used in the research process: historical; abstract-logical; statistical and economic methods, in particular, correlation-regression, graphical grouping, tabular representation method. Results. The article considers the problems of targeted food support formation for the population. In the current crisis conditions for the state, which are caused by the war with russia, domestic food aid has grounds for use in Ukraine. The deterioration of quantitative and, especially, qualitative indicators of population reproduction has become a steady trend. The social situation of mothers and children, the future of our country, has noticeably deteriorated. The United States, the BRICS and the European Union experience shows that an effective mechanism for such support is to stimulate final consumption of food through food aid programs for the needy. In recent years, there has been a rapid increase in US budget spending on domestic food aid for the population. Assessing the current state of implementation of domestic food support in Ukraine, we can say that mass implementation has not taken place. The main factors in this situation are the underdeveloped legal framework and the lack of common approaches to the implementation of domestic food aid. Decentralization of powers, namely the power to provide domestic food support, delegated to the level of integrated territorial communities. They are implemented by the subjects in accordance with the approved programs. These programs regulate food finance in schools and preschools. Limited in the financial aspect of the budgets of the united territorial communities and absence of state support stimulating measures. In the current conditions it is necessary to centralize and delegate the authority to provide domestic food aid at the national level, consolidate common approaches. The system of domestic food aid to the poor is an effective tool to stimulate food consumption by certain categories of the population, the development of retail trade, catering and production of agricultural and food products, other sectors of the economy. At the same time, it has a peculiarity and a difference from other parts of the agricultural sector state support system. Domestic food aid is an consumer market element and is implemented through its existing infrastructure (shops, markets, other retail outlets, catering facilities) without replacing or administratively suppressing market mechanisms in the functioning of the consumer market. Scope of research results. The results of the research will be used in the development of organizational and economic principles of targeted food aid.
Key words: population, poverty, food aid, income level, food security
References
1. Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny 254k/96-VR [Constitution of Ukraine 254k / 96-VR]. Version of February 21, 2019. https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/constitution. [in Ukrainian]. 2. Заячук М. Д., Заячук О. Г. (2015). Terytorialni osoblyvosti yemnosti rehionalnykh rynkiv prodovolstva v Ukraini ta perspektyvy fermerskykh hospodarstv u yikh napovnenni [Territorial features of the capacity of regional food markets in Ukraine and the prospects of farms in filling them]. Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskoho universytetu. Heohrafiia. [Scientific Bulletin of Chernivtsi University. Geography]. 744-745. С. 140-144. [in Ukrainian].
3. Knyazhenko I. I., Troshkin S. M., Nekhamkin M. R. (2021). Prodovolcha bezpeka ahrobiznesu v konteksti vyklykiv pandemiyi (COVID19) [Food security of agribusiness in the context of pandemic challenges (COVID19)]. Visnyk Berdyanskoho universytetu menedzhmentu i biznesu [Bulletin of Berdyansk University of Management and Business]. № 1. P. 30-36. [in Ukrainian].
4. Zhylka N. Ya., Slabkyy H. O. (2016). Realizatsiya derzhavnoyi polityky shchodo zdorovya ditey u spivpratsi z mizhnarodnymy proektamy (analitychnyy ohlyad naukovoyi literatury) [Implementation of state policy on children's health in cooperation with international projects (analytical review of scientific literature)]. Ekonomika i pravo okhorony zdorovya [Economics and law of health care]. 1 (3). P. 53-60. [in Ukrainian].
5. Kyrylenko S. V., Mykhaylov O. M., Serhiyenko V. P. (2012). Shkola kultury zdorovya: vid sohodennya do maybutnoho: navch.-metod. Posib [School of health culture: from the present to the future: a textbook]. Kyyiv, Chernivtsi: Bukrek [Bukrek]. 384 p. [in Ukrainian].
6. Pro stan orhanizatsiyi kharchuvannya u zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladakh m. Kyyeva na pochatok 2017-2018 navchalnoho roku. Informatsiyna dovidka [On the state of nutrition organization in secondary schools of Kyiv at the beginning of the 2017-2018 academic year: Information reference]. https://don.kyivcity.gov.ua/files/2017/11/13/info-dovidka.pdf [in Ukrainian].
7. Orlenko Ya. Yu. (2013). Osoblyvosti katehoriyi "prodovolcha bezpeka": teoretychni zasady [Features of the "food safety" category: theoretical foundations.]. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid [Investments: practice and experience]. № 11. P. 123-125. [in Ukrainian].
8. Polozhenye del v oblasty prodovolstvyya y selskoho khozyaystva. Sotsyalnaya zashchyta y selskoekhozyaystvo: razorvat porochnyy kruh nyshchety v selskykh rayonakh [The state of affairs in the field of food and agriculture. Social protection and agriculture: breaking the vicious circle of poverty in rural areas] (Eds.). FAO. (2015). 172 p. [in Russian].
9. Hidrobo, M., Hoddinott, J., Peterman, A., Margolies, A., Moreira, V. (2014). Cash, food, or vouchers? Evidence from a randomized experiment in northern Ecuador. Journal of Development Economics. 107. P. 144-156.
10. Jacoby, H. (2002). Is there an intrahousehold ‘flypaper effect’? Evidence from a school feeding programme. Economic Journal. 112. P. 196-221.
11. Evans, D. K., Popova, A. (2014). Cash transfers and temptation goods:a review of global evidence. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. № 6886. Washington, DC, World Bank.
12. Ekonomichnyi monitorynh 2017 r. № 32 [Economic monitoring in 2017] http://edclub.com.ua/analityka/informaciynyy-daydzhest-ekonomichnogo-dyskusiynogo-klubu-ekonomichnyy-monitor-no32-serpen. [in Ukrainian].
13. Tokar A. Yu., Ruda N. S. (2014). Prodovolcha bezpeka i znachennya pereroblennya plodiv ta ovochiv u yiyi zabezpechenni [Food security and the importance of processing fruits and vegetables in its provision]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Umanskoho natsionalnoho universytetu sadivnytstva [Collection of scientific works of Uman National University of Horticulture]. 86 (2). P. 111-116. [in Ukrainian].
14. Zhyvko Z. B., Danylenko N. B., Stadnyk M. Ye. (2019). Prodovolcha bezpeka Ukrayiny: teoretyko-analitychnyy ohlyad [Food security of Ukraine: theoretical and analytical review]. Vcheni zapysky Tavriyskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlinnya [Scientific notes of Tavriya National University named V. I. Vernadsky. Series: Economics and Management]. 30 (69), №6(1). P. 15-23. [in Ukrainian].
15. Pro derzhavnu sotsialnu dopomohu malozabezpechenym simyam: Zakon Ukrainy. 2020. [On state social assistance to low-income families: Law of Ukraine]. Edited on July 1. http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1768-14 [in Ukrainian].